Classroom Culture

The thing I worry about most is the nature of my students’ interactions with me, with my subject, and with our shared environment. Lately, I’ve come to think of all these things as (my part of) the culture they encounter in, and around, school.

I want to be clear, in my use of the term “culture”, that I am not referring to climate of the school. The attitudes, behaviours, and discourse of the people in the school are like the motion of iron filings, and the pattern they form locally is the climate. Culture is the magnetic field.

Culture is, as Geertz puts it, “an ordered system of meaning and symbols, in terms of which social interaction takes place” (p 144). The meaning includes things like our values and our core beliefs, the symbols include the things we put on our walls and the vocabulary we adopt; the social interaction is education.

Creating a positive culture in a school or classroom has become a popular discussion-point for the education advice sector (example, example). Teachers should collaborate, listen, enact classroom rules that promote respect and sharing, and directly instruct children about community values. That’s a good start, and it is probably enough for the beginning teacher. But for those of us who really, genuinely care about our students, we are often compelled to do more.

Jose Vilson, in typically concise honesty, described what he learned teaching a difficult class during his first year in the classroom: “When I took off my mask and invested myself in a group of kids, the homeroom became a home. For all of us” (p 87). For him, the next step to creating a positive classroom culture was appreciating the students as individuals, with hopes and needs and fears. How else can we reach out to students, and establish the sort of culture the beginning teachers cannot?

Love Your Students

Love your students. Take them for who they are, flaws and all, and love them anyway. Love them when they are causing trouble, and you will see their misbehaviour as symptomatic of some deeper need. Love them when they do poorly on assessments, and they will learn that some things are more important than test scores. Love them for their humanity when fellow teachers blame them for their failures. Don’t be afraid to tell them so, at the right time.

I once had a troublesome high school math class that missed the deadline for an important project. They assumed I would treat them as their other teachers did: admonishment, an extended deadline, and complaints home. I told them that my love for them wasn’t contingent on their work.. They should finish it at their own pace, but that it was necessary for the course. That changed the dynamic of our classroom: mutual trust and affection meant that we could navigate problems, rather than butting heads against them.

Accept Friend and Follow Requests

We all know that our social media need to be sanitized. So what’s the problem with connecting with our students online? I tried to answer that question last year.

On Facebook, I can wish happy birthday and celebrate achievements outside of school. I can keep an eye out for dangers, too, and help students learn about privacy and the internet.

Develop Respect Beyond “Mister”

My students have called me a lot of things, but they rarely call me my name. Even after years of developing and displaying their deep respect for me as their teacher, my students use an awkward and unnecessary formality: “Mr Doucette”. I would rather that my students show their respect for me and my classes through their actions, and by accepting me as a human being — which is something quite difficult when you’re not even allowed to use my name.

Dress Appropriately

Several years ago, I developed a teacher costume. At the time, as a young male teacher, I needed to send the appropriate cue to female students whose crushes distracted them from their work. I typically wear a white or blue shirt with a bow tie, a v-neck sweater or cardigan, a tweed jacket, corduroy trousers, and brown dress shoes. It is almost comically professorial, and it makes me a well-known character in my school.

Recently, however, I’ve found that my style of dress makes it difficult for students to conceptualize me as a human beyond the teacher character they’ve framed in their minds. I wonder how I could dress in such a way as to promote positive classroom culture? I’ve got a great hoodie that says “Niceness is Priceless”, and I’ve worn it a few times.

Eliminate Implicit Bias and Stereotype Threat

Implicit bias is probably affecting how most teachers act in the classroom. During the past two years, I’ve kept a careful eye out, and caught myself a few times: calling more frequently on boys than girls, presuming girls are more interested in the social sciences and boys in the physical sciences, and “mansplaining” to my peers more than once. I think I’m getting better at treating everyone as an individual worthy of their own types, rather than relying on stereotypes.

Stereotype threat, on the other hand, is something I cannot eliminate, because it is brought into the class by my students. I can try to ensure that all students know their particulars are not relevant to academic success in my class. For some students, who struggle, I have had mini-interventions that seemed to be successful.

Surround Ourselves with Cultural Artifacts

The walls of my classroom are covered in student work and colourful, engaging, and useful posters. I’m happy with that. But these cultural artifacts are of my designs. Even the student work was created according to tasks and rubrics I designed. If the classroom is truly to become a shared cultural space, then I think the walls need to reflect our shared culture, even if that means posters of Rey and Biebs.

Kids Online

Cyberbullying, online harassment, or simply being inappropriate on the internet: for my students, these are becoming increasingly commonplace. I’m worried.

I want to think about what I need to do better, as a teacher and a coach. So here’s a list of the ways I’m failing my students:

  • I am not modelling appropriate behaviour on social media for them to observe
  • I am not directly instructing them about data retention policies, legalities, and (lack of) privacy
  • I am not teaching them how to deal with peer pressure online
  • I am not training them to be empathetic
  • I am not supervising, or even keeping an eye out for trouble, when they are outside my classroom
  • Since they don’t, I assume I have not made my students feel they can come to me if they are having trouble
  • I am not engaging in, or sustaining, a dialogue with the students’ parents about their engagement in social media

My school could do more to red-flag inappropriate behaviour in our Google Apps set-up. Most parents should probably be doing a lot more to monitor what is going on with their students. Yet, clearly, I feel that part of the failure is my own.

Here’s what I know about the best teachers: when they fail, they come back the next day with a new, better idea. In that spirit, here’s my plan:

  1. Work empathy-building activities into the classroom (for my middle school students), and work empathy-building into our learning activities (for my high school students, where time is a precious commodity). In addition, I will try to think of all-school activities that could help to build empathy between students who normally don’t interact.
  2. Start accepting friend requests on Facebook, returning follows on Twitter, and so forth; try to engage in a positive way with my students on social media; and keep an eye out for dark corners (I made this argument last year).
  3. For the students I advise, prepare some lessons about responsible online citizenship, and share them with my colleagues if there is interest.
  4. From there, once I know more, try to contact parents as appropriate to cheerlead, support, and inform.

It’s time to go connect with some of my students.

Modeling Thermo

In applying the modeling methodology to IBDP physics, there are a few gaps. In this post, I present a unit that uses the modeling approach for the thermal physics and thermodynamics unit of Physics.

1. Building background

Have students touch something warm and sonething cold. Ask what is happening in terms of energy in these interactions. There are two main goals for this short preliminary discussion:

a. definitions of the terms heat and internal energy
b. an agreement that heat, as a transfer of energy, is sufficient to explain thermal processes, and is what we feel

2. Paradigm Lab I

For this lab, masses of hot and cold water are mixed in an insulated cup. After a demonstration of the effect, students should walk through a variable brainstorming session (I like a version I learned from Karl Schmidt that has three steps: observations, measure-ables, manipulate-ables). The students should recognize that either the hot water mass or the cold water mass could serve as the independent variable. They will recognize that the temperatures are dependent, but might need some help to decide to use the ratio of temperature changes as the dependent variable.

The students will thus conduct two labs, perhaps by splitting into two groups and sharing in the whiteboard meeting. They should find that the ratio of temperature changes is proportional to one of the masses and inversely proportional to the other. Be careful to define the ratio of temperature changes clearly for everyone before beginning data collection.

Combining results and looking at slopes allows us to construct the equation:

mass of hot water * temperature change for hot water = mass of cokd water * temperature change for cold water

Now, the students should recognize that this reflects the heat flow discussed earlier, but since heat is n energy change the units don’t work out and we need to have a coefficient. Students should think about what this coefficient means (it is the energy released/absorbed to change the temperature by one degree Celcius for each kilogram of matter).

3. Some practice with calorimetry problems without phase changes here. I spontaneously put two on the board at the front, and had student pairs write a third.

4. Demonstrate a melting curve. This may be difficult, but at least set up the apparatus and sketch the resulting curve.

First provide students with the power output of the heater and the mass of your sample and ask them to find the specific heat capacity of the sample (ie: using the slope).

Next, point to a segment where the temperature is unchanging and ask students to try to explain what is happening here. Socratic questioning and your favourite applet (PhET, etc) is good here. There are lots of misconceptions here, so insist on very clear statements and model IB language (ie: from past exams).

Students can usually guess the form of the latent heat equation (Q=mL), so I ask them how they would design an experiment to test that, and then we move on.

5. Model deployment, proper.

Now, the students are ready for some lengthier calorimetry problems, so they do a worksheet of these.

6. Quiz

A quiz based on the worksheet.

7. Practical I

I do a calorimetry problem at the front of the room, moving a hidden mass of steel from a hot water bath to a known mass of cold water. I provide the temperatures and the students predict the mass, which we put on a balance once all the predictions are in.

8. Paradigm Lab II

This could be done using a PhET simulation, or with an apparatus like the one shown below (the block could be replaced with a heating element to manipulate the temperature, and a pressure sensor should be attached to the flask somewhere):


Image from Purdue University (

Briefly outline the nature of an ideal gas (no potential energy, elastic collisions providing pressure, etc). In the regular pre-lab process, students should identify pressure, volume, temperature, and number of molecules (or mols) as the relevant variables. For now, leave the number of moles aside (ie: keep the device closed): this leaves three experiments, all of which should be done:

  1. How does a changing temperature affect the pressure at constant volume?
  2. How does a changing temperature affect the volume, when the volume is adjusted (ie: by extending the syringe) so that the pressure is constant?
  3. How a changing volume affect the pressure at constant temperature? (this works better by connecting the syringe directly to the pressure sensor)

Connecting these gives that PV/T = constant. Logically, P and V should be proportional to the number of moles n, while T is inversely proportional to n (at constant P and V), so this becomes PV/T = nR, where R is the ideal gas constant.

After rearranging this equation into the familiar form (PV=nRT), as students to determine the units on the left side. This gives the units of R as J/mol/K and, more importantly, shows that the ideal gas law is fundamentally a statement about the amount of internal energy in the gas. A brief note about the Maxwell distribution and rms velocities of the particles is probably appropriate here, even though it does take us out of the modeling cycle.

9. Deployment II

Now, the students do a second worksheet, on the ideal gas law. This also includes the three constituent laws (Boyle’s, Charles’, and the Gay-Lussac/Amonton) and practice with the exam-style question “determine whether this graph shows that the gas obeys Boyle’s Law (etc)” by checking points on the graph to determine whether the relationship is proportional, inverse, or otherwise.

10. Practical II


11. Unit Test


Social Justice in Physics

Moses Rifkin does a superb 6-day unit on social justice in his physics class. Here, by arguing against it, a Fox News correspondent makes it clear why social justice is needed:

I wanted to do something similar to Moses, but I had two constraints:

  1. Since I teach IB physics, and already don’t get enough contact hours, I couldn’t devote more than a class period to it.
  2. Since I teach at an international school in Northern Europe, the social justice issues experienced by my students and in our culture will not necessarily be racial in nature.

Thus, I tried to lift out my favourite parts from Moses’ curriculum, and recontextualize everything to be more universal in nature. Our discussions ended up primarily focusing on sexism, with class, religion and disabilities as other sources of examples and discussion.

We started with some ground rules, directly pilfered from Moses:


Second, I introduced the idea of stereotype threat. Two students had studied this in a psychology class, but had difficult explaining it. I gave an example (as a North American in Europe, I fear being seen as monolingual, and am disinclined to practice languages as I struggle to learn, thus learning less well). The students brainstormed examples in pairs, then shared out. This took about 15 minutes.

Third, I had students randomly select from a list of social groups. They used their computers to quickly find and research two physicists from that social group. In a circle, they shared who they found and I probed with questions like “how did you find this person?”, “how did you choose this physicist?”, “had you heard of this person before today?” and “was it hard to find physicists in this social group?” Our list of social groups (the last two were suggested by students during our discussions):

women, men, heterosexual, homosexual, black, white, young, old, disabled, able-bodied, Christian/Muslim/Jewish, Eastern religion, European/American, not European/American, upper class, lower class

This led fairly naturally to a discussion of why some of these social groups are under-represented among physicists. I asked the students to make hypotheses to explain the under-representation, and then to offer counter-examples for the hypotheses, if they could think of any. Our hypotheses were that the distribution of physicists:

  • represents the population
  • is determined by the geographical location of universities and research institutions
  • is determined by the populations access to education
  • is determined by social expectations
  • is determined by history/politics

These were all seen to be unsuccessful as a complete explanation. Next, we switched directions, and looked at the barriers for people of under-represented social groups. Some good arguments were presented here, including the effect of expensive tuition at university, the impact of stereotypes, and the role of religion. I was able to cap-off these arguments by labeling these effects as the essence of institutional sexism, racism, classism, ablism, agism, homophobia, etc.

We finished with the Implicit Association Test about gender and science. I told the students that they need not share their scores, but many were keen to talk about it, so I know that we got a variety of results that approximately conform to what one would expect from a mixed group.

Before we left, I tried to introduce the idea of privilege, and especially of white privilege, but I think this fell flat, like everything does when you’ve got two minutes until lunchtime.

Rule of Names

In “The Rule of Names”, Ursula Le Guin introduces us to a world in which people’s names have magical power over them. The idea reappears in Harry Potter, where Voldemort enchants his very name. And as teachers, we know that names necessarily precede trust, discipline, and learning.

Generally, we choose what our students call us. In some schools, teachers and students use first names only; in others, it is strictly a last-name basis. Honorifics (Ms, Mr, Mrs, etc) indicate — and perhaps teach — respect for one’s elders or superiors. Nicknames or first names promote closeness, friendliness, or treating students “as equals”. We may use different names with different grades, or in different contexts. But clearly, names are pedagogically meaningful.

Screen Shot 2015-11-09 at 10.37.32 PM

The names in use at my school, I suspect, reflect gender, cultural, and positional hierarchies. The following data reflects the most common form of address used by students at my school, when they interact directly with their own teachers (all data has been corroborated by others). The graphs in this post show the number of adult employees at my school, without numbers on the axes to protect privacy (sorry maths students!).

Interpretation: Locally hired employees are more than five times more likely to be called by their first name than foreign hires (significant at p = 0.01). Male teachers are 52% more likely to be called by their last names (significant at p = 0.05). And while 76% of teachers are called by their last name, none of the school’s TAs are so addressed (significant at p = 0.01).
Screen Shot 2015-11-09 at 10.37.16 PMI am concerned about this for two reasons:

  1. It creates and reinforces unhealthy stereotypes. Names may reflect class or gender divisions, and this may have unintended consequences. For example, a student may conceptually put her TA (Ms Anna) into the same category as the domestic help, while her teacher (Mrs Smith) is considered to be the same class as one’s parents, with various undesirable outcomes. Or students may subtly be conditioned to believe that teaching is a woman’s career, and that men who teach are only undertaking it temporarily, perhaps on their way to bigger things.
  2. It shows that our work environment may embody some unhealthy biases. For example, the foreigners may call their local coworkers by their first names because those are easier to pronounce, without offering the same courtesy in return. Or some might unconsciously suspect that the TAs are less professional or less dedicated to their jobs.

Screen Shot 2015-11-09 at 10.43.12 PM

I don’t have a conclusion or an answer. But if you do, please leave a comment or write an email to let me know!

Genève Internationale

I spent the past week in Switzerland, on a trip with some of my high-school physics students.

What we did

We spent a day in Bern de-abstractifying an icon the Einstein museum, contemplating food waste at Äss-Bar (which sells second-day products from bakeries), and admiring marvels of nature and architecture at the bear pit and cathedral respectively. Our trip at CERN took us to the original Synchro-Cyclotron, which has been reimagined as a superbly-lighted display piece; to mission control at ATLAS, where a dozen physicists looked remarkably busy during a scheduled shutdown; and to a wonderful lunch-chat with my friend Sarah, who then took us back to her lab to talk about radiation-hardened electronics and detectors. We finished the afternoon with a trip up the téléphérique at Mont Salève. On the third day, we took a tour at Webster University in nearby Bellevue, where the students got a lot of good advice about university applications, before walking around the campus at the Université de Genève and spending a couple hours at the superb Musée d’Art et d’Histoire.

Outreach done right

CERN devotes a significant amount of time and money to outreach. Researchers volunteer to lead tours, all the labs seem to have some sort of visitor display, and there are numerous programmes targeting students. However, it doesn’t always seem to come off effectively. Our tour guides have usually been enthusiastic about physics, but are unfamiliar with how to speak to people educationally: wait times, asking questions to maintain engagement and determine understanding, and finding ways for the ideas to explain themselves whenever possible.

The big ideas — the standard model, how the LHC works, why it is so big and expensive — are important and rightfully are thoroughly addressed. However, my students were much more engaged with Sarah talked about her own work. For them, photo-multiplier tubes and fibre-optic cables are just as exotic as the 1200 precision-engineered dipole magnets that largely make up the LHC ring, while also being more tangible. Sarah talking about her specific efforts to reduce the size and study the material effects of opto-electric connections was more effective than the lecture about the dipoles (and higher-order multipoles).

At the time we visited, the Globe was closed for (comprehensive, by the looks of it) reconstructions, and the Microcosm exhibit in the visitor reception building was much smaller than it has been in the past (representing the present LHC experiments only). CERN has decades of brilliant, revolutionary physics apparatus that the public never gets to see. Sarah stopped to tell us about Gargamelle, which is sitting in an unkempt courtyard behind the reception building, but there is otherwise little indication of the great CERN experiments of the past. I would love for CERN to show off some of the great artifacts they are surely storing, as a way to preserve the history of the institution.

Oh, and if you can use Lego to make a model of something, do it!


Genève Internationale

In Geneva, we sometimes heard this cliché phrase about the city’s international character. The city is famous for its banking, high-end watches, and lax taxation laws — consequently drawing in a population of haves from around the world. Yet while reminders of the multicultural character of the city are ubiquitous, this is a city of the well-off, and not a city of the world. The high cost of living, paucity of opportunities for the working poor, and surfeit of high-priced hotels ensure that this city of diplomacy is rooted in 19th-century notions of inter-state affairs, rather than to the idea of governments and diplomats as servants of the people.

This effect, where the world is flat for the moneyed but round as ever for the poor, is something familiar to those of us who work in international schools. I need to think deeply about how to instill the ideals of social justice for such a community.


One thing Geneva does well is food. We had some great meals, including Ethiopian, Lebanese, and Swiss cuisine. Like a friendly discussion in the Middle East about hummus, maybe food can be a way to bring us together. Yet it cannot be the meat of multiculturalism — and I have thinking to do about how to involve my high school students critically in our upcoming International Day pot-luck + song/dance performances.

Women in Physics

During the trip, I read Mary K Gaillard’s memoir, A Singularly Unfeminine Profession. The quality of the writing and editing is unpolished, but the anecdotes speak clearly of a culture quite resistant to the inclusion of women physicists at the top levels, both at CERN and in the United States.

Sarah spoke with the students, and especially with the women interested in pursuing careers in STEM. Challenges remain, and both unhealthy environments and unacceptable behaviour from male leaders persist. However, Sarah was optimistic, saying that she had never felt like there was anything she couldn’t do.

Thus, moving forward, the task is to remain vigilant about bad situations and people, and to focus our efforts on the intangibles, like culture, that are driving the current gender gap.

"Knowledge repels the advances of Love"

“Knowledge repels the advances of Love”

Old Experiments

The Museum of the History of Science in Geneva is a special place, and I was happy to share it with the students. Here are two things that struck me:

A motivation for the metric system

A motivation for the metric system

Use metal parabolic dishes to transfer infrared waves, showing that "heat" is a wave

Use metal parabolic dishes to transfer infrared waves, showing that “heat” is a wave

Quantifying Border Crossing

In a previous post, I wrote about our failure to provide a culturally relevant and responsive education for all students. One component of that failure — the one closest to my heart and practice — is the conflict between “science culture” and students’ own cultures. The theory of border crossing provides a context for understanding the cultural mechanism at work here, and thus suggests a way forward for science teachers.

Border crossing was usefully applied to science education by Costa [paywalled]. Aikenhead gives a very good (albeit long-ish) overview, including contextualizing border crossing as a cultural theory of science. A subsequent paper by Aikenhead summarizes the idea quite well.


Border crossing suggests that students cross a virtual border between their home culture and the culture of school-science when they enter the science classroom. Students can respond to this crossing in several particular ways:

  1. Potential Scientists cross the border easily because their home culture is aligned with school-science culture. For example, they might have learned the Newtonian view of nature implicitly from their parents.
  2. Other Smart Kids can manage the border crossing because they are attuned to school culture even though the science culture is foreign to them. They tend to achieve high grades because they work hard, but are unlikely to grasp new scientific concepts intuitively. They tend to be able to apply science concepts in scientific contexts, but consider them applicable only in particular domains (such as the classroom, or science tests).
  3. Outsiders are students who struggle with the border crossing. They tend to do poorly at school overall because school culture is incompatible with their personal culture.
  4. Outside-Insiders tend to understand science ideas fairly readily, but often have difficulty in science class because of the baggage associated with the school environment. For example, they might have problems in their dealings with authority.
  5. I Don’t Know students have essentially “checked-out” from the learning process, because of the huge gap between their home culture and school culture.
  6. Aikenhead has also identified a group of students he terms the I Want to Know students. These students tend to be interested in science, but may have some difficulty with learning in the science classroom.

I think of I Want to Know as a moderate form of the Outside-Insiders, and the I Don’t Know students as extreme forms of the Outsiders. Thus, I will exclude the former of these from the subsequent analysis for now.

Although I know about these groupings, and can use them to help me target my instruction, it is usually difficult to categorize students, especially when our conversations take place through the medium of the very science culture I’m trying to abstract. To help with this process, I have been working on a paired-test assessment that identifies students’ approaches to border-crossing.

The assessment instrument consists of two tests (I will share these in a future post). The first is a standard-looking multiple-choice test that is administered in the classroom. The second can be taken online with a computer or a smartphone (via the browser), and is visually similar (and written somewhat akin) to the popular BuzzFeed quizzes. The idea is that the first test will represent a student’s cultural leanings in the classroom, and the second test will represent home cultural beliefs.

Screen Shot 2015-10-11 at 1.25.56 PM

The tests are related to the energy concept, which I chose because of its ubiquity as a core idea in science and because of its presence as a concept in non-scientific worldviews.

Each quiz has four answers, which correspond roughly to four different energy concepts:

  • the scientific, mechanistic view of energy
  • energy as a force of life (vis-viva)
  • energy as a property of moving and changing things (flux)
  • energy as a measure of harmony or balance (qi)

By looking at answers to the paired questions, we can identify students as belonging to one of the four border-crossing groups under consideration. The graph below shows the four answers on the horizontal and vertical axes for the first paired question. Circle areas are proportional to the number of students who chose each pair of answers.

Screen Shot 2015-10-11 at 1.31.28 PM

My next step will be to determine whether each student is consistently falling into one of these four groups over all eight questions. There’s more to come, stay tuned and let me know what you think!